Isolationism Vs Internationalism
Isolationism Vs Internationalism Free Essay Example
Internationalism is a political principle that advocates greater political or economic cooperation among states and nations. Supporters of internationalism are known as internationalists and generally believe that humans should unite across national, political, cultural, racial, or class boundaries to advance their common interests, or that governments should cooperate because their mutual long-term interests are of greater importance than their short-term disputes. Internationalism has several interpretations and meanings, but is usually characterized by opposition to nationalism and isolationism ; support for international institutions, such as the United Nations ; and a cosmopolitan outlook that promotes and respects other cultures and customs. The term is similar to, but distinct from, globalism and cosmopolitanism.
Positive And Negative Effects Of Internationalism
Internationalism is one of the most familiar but controversial ideologies of our time, with the world opinion sharply divided on its feasibility. It is, no doubt, an infant doctrine, having been born as a definite idea only in the second quarter of the 20th century. But is gaining momentum so steadily that it has already come to be recognized as a forceful ideology capable of curing the conflict-ridden world of its besetting ills. Internationalism may, therefore, be called the ideology of the day and is sure to constitute the corner-stone of future of political thinking. Internationalism, like its adversary, Nationalism, is not easy to define in precise terms.
In Russia in , imperialism was a tangible force in everyday life. Indeed, the key political positions adopted by Lenin and the rest of the party throughout were based, to varying degrees, on their view of the imperialist character of the war and their consequent immovable opposition to it. It was for this reason that the Soviets, and not the Provisional Government and its participants, could continue to hold legitimacy in a situation of dual power.